"Only the first {1} posts of {0} will be displayed." CS2007

"Only the first {1} posts of {0} will be displayed." CS2007

  • This message shows after splitting a thread in the left column of the tree view. The message area keeps refreshing without displaying the message at all. The message shows only in the flat table view, but isn't linked from the forum list. The message is linked from the user's post list.

    It's a very painful bug and I'll very appreciate a fix.

     

    Thanks

     

    Dan 

  • The fix for this will need to made in the core code... I am filing this in our bug tracking system and will get it fixed.

     

    In the meantime, you can do one of the following things to temporarily fix the message:

    1. Edit Languages\en-US\Resources.xml and change the resource named PostThreadedView_TooManyMessages so that the message does not contain the {0} and {1} characters
    2. Remove the following line from Themes\default\Forums\thread-threadedview.ascx

      <CSControl:ResourceControl runat="server" ResourceName="PostThreadedView_PostTreeHeading" Tag="Div" CssClass="ForumPostTreeHeading" />

    3. Change the maximum posts to display value on the ForumPostTreeForm, which is set at 200.  You can do this by editing Themes\default\Forums\thread-threadedview.ascx and changing the ForumPostTreeForm at the bottom of the file so it looks like the following:

      <CSForum:ForumPostTreeForm runat="server" NotAllPostsDisplayedControlId="TooManyPostsMessage" PostTreeContextMenuId="PostContextMenu" PostTreeViewId="ThreadTree" ViewPostIframeId="PostContainer"
      MaximumPostsToDisplay="1000"/>

  • The fix for this has been filed and you can learn how to do it by reading the following KB article:

    http://docs.communityserver.org/kb/article.aspx/281/only-the-first-1-posts-of-0-will-be-displayed-in-thread-with-200-posts/

     

    Thanks,

  • Wow.. that was amazingly fast.. thanks for the reaction.

    I should clarify one thing though: the original thread never had more than 10 messages, the new thread had 1-3 messages... so we didn't have 200 messages :( Good if you found another bug - but is there a chance that our situation is even something different?

     Thanks again anyway

    Dan